Open Nav

论反垄断法的执法机构(附答辩记录)

以下是资料介绍,如需要完整的请充值下载.
1.无需注册登录,支付后按照提示操作即可获取该资料.
2.资料以网页介绍的为准,下载后不会有水印.仅供学习参考之用.
   帮助中心
资料介绍:

论反垄断法的执法机构(附答辩记录)(包含选题审批表,任务书,开题报告,中期检查报告,毕业论文11000字,答辩记录,成绩评定册)
摘  要:伴随市场经济的深入发展,我国的垄断问题日益凸显,中国目前的垄断现象极其严重。一方面,我国存在大量的行政性垄断行为,另一方面,经济性垄断也不断涌现。不管是行政垄断,抑或经济垄断,都会损害市场的有效竞争,都会减少消费者福利,都会降低社会经济效率,都应受到竞争法的规制。我国《反垄断法》尚存许多需要完善的地方,如法律责任的设定、行政垄断的规制以及反垄断执法机构的设置,等等。而这些问题都与反垄断执法机构密切相关,法律责任的规定牵涉到反垄断执法机构的职权设置。我国目前承担反垄断执法职责的机构包括商务部、国家工商总局和国家发改委,因此可以说,反垄断执法机构仍未确定。因此,本文仅就我国反垄断法执法机构的设置现状与改进措施的问题进行探讨, 并且借鉴国内外的经验, 尝试提出一些完善的建议。
关键字:反垄断法;执法机构;设置原则;改进建议

ON THE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Abstract:With further development of market economy, China's monopoly has become increasingly prominent, China's current monopoly is extremely serious. On the one hand, there are a lot of administrative monopoly, on the other hand, economic monopolies are emerging. Whether it is administrative monopoly, or economic monopoly would undermine effective competition in the market, will reduce consumer welfare, would reduce the social and economic efficiency, should be subject to competition law regulation. China's "anti-monopoly law"surviving many needs for improvement, such as setting legal liability, administrative monopoly regulation and antitrust law enforcement agencies set up, and so on. These problems are closely related to anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies, legal liability provisions of the antitrust enforcement agencies involved in setting the terms of reference. China's current commitment to anti-monopoly law enforcement duties include the Ministry of Commerce, State Administration for Industry and State Development and Reform Commission, it can be said that anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies have not yet determined. Therefore, this article only in respect of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies to set the issue status and discuss improvement measures, and learn from the experience at home and abroad, try to make some sound recommendations.

[版权所有:http://DOC163.com]


Key words:The Anti-Monopoly Law; Enforcement Agency; Setting Principle; Suggestions for Improvement

目  录
摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………1
关键词………………………………………………………………………………………1
一、    现行反垄断法执法机构的概述………………………………………………………2
(一)现行反垄断法执法机构的概述…………………………………………………2
[来源:http://www.doc163.com]

(二)现行反垄断法执法机构的设置原则……………………………………………2
二、    理论界关于反垄断法执法机构的观点………………………………………………3
三、    现行反垄断法执法机构存在的问题…………………………………………………4
(一)执法机构独立性不强…………………………………………………………4
(二)执法机构权威性不足…………………………………………………………4
(三)中央地方职能划分不具体………………………………………………………4 [资料来源:http://Doc163.com]
(四)执法效率太低……………………………………………………………5
(五)执法人员不够专业化……………………………………………………5
(六)执法机构与行业监管部门的管辖权划分不清……………………………6
¬    (七)执法监督等制衡措施不到位……………………………………………………6
四、    完善我国反垄断法执法机构的建议………………………………………………6
(一)强化执法机构独立性…………………………………………………………6 [资料来源:Doc163.com]
(二)提高执法机构权威性…………………………………………………………7
(三)具体划分中央与地方的职权范围……………………………………………7
(四)统一执法机构………………………………………………………………8
(五)完善执法机构专业性…………………………………………………………8
(六)协调与行业监管部门的关系……………………………………………………9
(七)发挥法院监督作用, 建立反垄断执法机构的监督机制, 完善当事人的救济……………9 [来源:http://Doc163.com]
五、    结束语………………………………………………………………………………10
参考文献 …………………………………………………………………………………10
致谢……………………………………………………………………………………11 [版权所有:http://DOC163.com]

  • 关于资料
    提供的资料属本站所有,真实可靠,确保下载的内容与网页资料介绍一致.
  • 如何下载
    提供下载链接或发送至您的邮箱,资料可重复发送,若未收到请联系客服.
  • 疑难帮助
    下载后提供一定的帮助,收到资料后若有疑难问题,可联系客服提供帮助.
  • 关于服务
    确保下载的资料和介绍一致,如核实与资料介绍不符,可申请售后.
  • 资料仅供参考和学习交流之用,请勿做其他非法用途,转载必究,如有侵犯您的权利或有损您的利益,请联系本站,经查实我们会立即进行修正! 版权所有,严禁转载
    doc163.com Copyright © 2012-2024 苏ICP备2021029856号-4